On the 29th of this month, --the date the Uruguayan C.I.O.V.I. was created— I will celebrate 62 years as Ufologist.
I can remember the enthusiasm we had in 1958 when we started our task from scratch.
I also know the many experiences we went through and the maturity we reached dealing with the subject over the years.
In our experience, we were able to solve all the cases submitted to our consideration or those we went to investigate for our initiative.
Throughout the years, and with renewed people, one thing was characteristic of C.I.O.V.I.: we were serious, responsible, reliable, we never negotiated with the subject, we never even thought to make money exploiting commercially the phenomenon.
Starting in 1959 we cooperated with the Uruguayan Air Force, and have always been ready to do so. We can do it right now if we are asked for it.
With all this as a background, we never thought that the UFOlogy environment could be so twisted, contaminated, and distorted on purpose.
Regretfully from the very beginning, some people saw in the UFO theme a way to make money.
We remember very well what happened with the first contactees, like George Adamsky, Orfeo Angelucci, Truman Bethurum, Frank Scully, George Van Tassel, and others. Those who convened meetings at a place called Giant Rock, in California, gave speeches about their “experiences”, talk about their trips to other planets, and sold their books.
Now we have the pompously called the International UFO Museum and Research Center in Roswell, New Mexico. A place to buy books, toys, ET costumes, etc. Just for tourism, and nothing else.
There are some imitations –although much more limited— in some other places, particularly in Latin America. People who declare a road as the way to UFOs, or a field as a landing place for UFOs, or to see UFOs. People who have put signs of welcome to extraterrestrials, and people that exploit the credulity of others to organize excursions to some kind of “sanctuaries” where the presence of beings of other dimensions is only seen by those who have faith….or have consumed some hallucinogen.
We have people that fabricating false mummies pretend to convince others that they are authentic and belong to extraterrestrials.
We have the charlatan Sixto Paz Wells traveling permanently throughout Latin America to repeat tales about interplanetary trips and contact with aliens.
This is what we tend to see as fauna of collateral activities that although using the acronym "ufo”, and some individuals dare to call themselves “ufologists”, or “investigators”, they are nothing but merchants of the worst kind.
Some of them have TV programs –like Jaime Maussan in México—or radio programs –the list is enormous. Others produce videos that upload to YouTube, and have web pages, or publish books, and produce videos and DVDs like Ademar Gevaerd in Brazil, who also organizes international “congresses” where believing in aliens is a condition sine-qua-non to participate.
All this is pathetic, but now there is something even more sinister and dangerous:
a) people who belong to a private organization that presumably investigate UFO reports, and pose internationally as “official researchers”
b) an American company that is offering contracts to some “investigators” in Latin America, provided they report to the company UFO cases and the possible finding of “metamaterial” (supposedly coming from a crashed UFO).
We are astonished and vehemently denounce this that is going on, and there is only one word to describe it: corruption.
Almost reviving a dead
Unless you hear or follow the liars, the reality indicates clearly that the UFO subject in the World is almost dead.
There are no new cases, no fantastic encounters, nothing.
In Europe, Ufologists dedicate themselves to care and put in order their libraries and files, exchange press clips, and things like that. Skepticism has won their hearts.
In Latin America, with tiny exceptions, the subject has lost it's attractiveness and relevance. A book written by a Chilean military says it clearly: “Los Extraterrestres Han Muerto: El mito ovni-ET, Contactismo y Abducciones” (Extraterrestrials have died: The myth UFO-ET, Contactism and Abductions” by our colleague and UAPSG member Rodrigo Andrés Bravo Garrido.
In the United States –by reasons that still are not clear—the Defense Department this time through the U.S. Navy, is desperately trying to re-create the environment lived at the beginning of the UFO era. They use the same jargon to describe objects or phenomena seen by some pilots, as it was used in the 1950s: "something that defies the laws of physics", "impossible maneuvers", "not of this Earth".
The Navy cases are from 16 and 5 years ago (November 14, 2004, and January 21, 2015). Nothing new, after all.
They were made publicly known using two newspapers: The New York Times and The Washington Post in 2017.
The story behind the pictures associated with the cases is one of a billionaire (Robert Bigelow) that put money to the electoral campaign of a Senator. Later this Senator (Harry Reid, leader of the Majority of the Senate during the Presidency of Barack Obama) convincing two other colleagues, obtained the approval of “black money” –that is money with unknown purpose—for a total of 22 million dollars, with two main recipients: the billionaire (10 million dollars) and the Pentagon (12 million dollars). See our article of October 7, 2019, under the title “Dissecting the U.S. Navy U.A.P. Case”.
With that money, de Department of Defense (Pentagon) created a program called initially Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Application Program (AAWSAP).
This program studied different technological approaches for possible future applications on space travel, as reveals this official list:
--Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Spacetime Metric) Engineering
--Spacetime Modification – Metric Sensor Approach
--Physical Effects as a Function of Metric Tensor Coefficients
Time Interval, Frequency, Energy
The velocity of Light in Spacetime-Altered Regions
Refractive Index Modeling
Effective Mass in Spacetime-Altered Regions
Gravity/Antigravity “Forces”
Considering:
Blueshifting of Infrared Heat Power Spectrum
Light-Bending in a Spacetime-Altered Region
Alcubierre Warp Drive Metric Structure
Later the Department of Defense created another program called AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program) and declared that it has nothing to do with UFOs (named now UAPs).
This program originally dealt with the danger for U.S.A --air and space activities-- posed by military activities of Russia or China.
On April 15, just 8 days ago, Russia fired an anti-satellite missile in a test of technology that the U.S. Space Force considered a threat to the American orbital assets. The Russian missile is capable to destroy satellites in low Earth orbit.
The AATIP also implied creating a center of expertise on advances in aerospace technologies.
It is possibly behind this second objective of AATIP that hides the interest on UAPs, interdimensional and paranormal phenomena.
And here comes Bigelow Aerospace.
Robert Bigelow, the billionaire, founded the company in 1998 using a great part of the money he gained through his ownership of the hotel chain Budget Suites of America.
In 2013 Bigelow invested U$250 million in the company and he announced that wanted to invest U$500 million through 2015.
The main purpose of the company was to create a modular set of space habitats to expand the International Space Station.
Later, Bigelow created what now is called Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) that produced a 494-page document under the title "Ten Month Report" compiled for AAWSAP.
In 2008 BAASS was awarded a U$10 million contract with one year of guarantee and a 5-year option.
The magazine Popular Mechanics says that “The Month Report” was followed by many others during the duration of the contract, and the subject dealt with was not the danger posed by foreign technologies but the UAPs.
There are references to “interdimensional phenomena” and Popular Mechanics made a list of topics dealt with by BAASS, among which:
--Strategic plans to organize a series of intellectual debate forums targeted to broad audiences about the "potential disclosure of an extraterrestrial presence”
--Project databases of UAP-related materials compiled through various partnerships, and the intent to expand these databases by coordinating with foreign governments
--Summaries of multiple UAP events both inside the U.S. and in foreign countries
--Photographs of UAPs provided by various sources, including foreign governments
Taking into account this background, BAASS has been trying to contact investigators in foreign countries.
The author of this article received in 1999 a letter from Ms. Melissa Godoy who was trying to explore the possibility to work with BAASS exchanging information about UFOs.
She received the proper information about the way CIOVI dealt with the subject, the investigation the Center developed in Uruguay, and the results of its work. It was enough to never again hear about Ms. Godoy or BAASS.
But we know that more recently BAASS sent to Latin America a group of people –some of them former USAF agents working for the company.
They visited Brazil, Argentina, and possibly Uruguay, and were also interested to get in contact with investigators in Chile, at least.
Among the people that went to Latin America were Ms. Godoy, Tim Koonce, Lucas Gornicher, Loran Huffman, and Douglas Kurth.
Some other people –that is the case of Argentina— were contacted by email signed by Colm Kelleher.
There is a notorious intention to involve in the program developed by BAASS as many investigators and institutions as possible, no matter if they are private or official. But behind the company is the Department of Defense.
If we put the pieces in order, BAASS is used to contact and if possible engage foreign countries in the policy that the Department of Defense wants to develop.
And that policy is no other than to create once again a kind of euphoria about UAPs.
But they know that the wish to know, the curiosity and the interest waked up for the cases happened in the United States starting with Kenneth Arnold, plus films, books, and articles in magazines of that era is not the same now.
Therefore they need to send people to Latin America trying to give a push to the natural apathy of today, and even being ready to spend some dollars to pay for the cooperation of investigators.
This never happened before!
And when they talk about governments, the level they can reach tells us that they think that authorities in Latin America are enough corruptible that they can win their favor delivering some dollars here and there.
We do not want to offend any government. But we do not doubt that some individuals surely are ready to cooperate in exchange for money, because that is why they have been always interested in UFOs: how to make money.
We are sure that no one honest, serious, and reliable investigator will accept to sell himself or herself to the will of BAASS.
As I wrote in my book “Elementos de Ovnilogía – Guía para la Investigación” (Elements of Ufology – Guide to the Investigation), Montevideo, 1989, 102 pages) on May 4, 1986, we developed –together with the Argentinian investigator Dr. Roberto E. Banchs a document under the title “Perfil de la Ovnilogía” (Ufology Profile).
Within that Profile, there was the principle of Non-Subsidiarity, and it says: “It is necessary to develop an investigation and study policy that will not be subsidiary of interests, concepts, opinions or foreign initiatives, but that has a firm root in the interests, perspective, and possibilities of each country."
We continue thinking in the same way.
Arrived at this point, it is obvious that we need to find an explanation for the barrage of press releases, comments on TV, and the abundance of opinions in the United States about the possible UAPs seen by U.S.Navy pilots, the creation of AATIP, the creation by the History Channel of a TV series with Mr.Luis Elizondo as the main figure called “Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation”, the creation also by the History Channel of the series “Project BlueBook” portraying an absurd Dr.J. Allen Hynek and exaggerating the facts of some “UFO cases”; the BAASS activity and also the creation of “To the Stars – Academy of Arts and Science” (a kind of Donald Keyhoe’s NICAP, but this time headed by a rock singer named Tom DeLonge) which we consider is not serious.
The explanation is simple: on the one hand, the United States is really worried that one day could be an accident due to the suspected interference of devices from Russia or China. Both countries are working on the development of hypersonic glide vehicles.
Russia declared that the “Avangard” –the name of the glider—will be capable to develop 20 times the speed of sound or more.
China has developed hypersonic missiles that can reach a speed of 10 times the speed of sound.
On the other hand, the United States is working on the development of hypersonic missiles capable of reaching many times the speed of sound. The contract has been given to the Lockheed Martin Company.
Also, Lockheed Martin is in charge to develop the SR-72 hypersonic. Called "the son of SR-71" the supersonic spy plane, the SR-72 will be unmanned and capable of reaching a speed of 14,500 miles per hour.
But there must be something else, more revolutionary, and for all of that, like in the old times, it is necessary to create the idea of UAPs. This time not extraterrestrial, but from another dimension. Just in case someone sees something extraordinary that it is not supposed to have seen.
Those who have read my book “OVNIs: La Agenda Secreta” (UFOs: The Secret Agenda”) will understand this perfectly well
We have to take into account that soon after the observations made by pilots of the carrier USS Nimitz and the Guided Missile Cruiser USS Princeton, people with authority came on a helicopter and sequestered the EP (electronic protection) records from both ships.
We will continue with our work
Unshakable about what BAASS could be doing we will continue with our work, that we properly call today as Aerospace Identification.
It implies the scientific approach to study and analyze any UAP report, apply all the experience we have accumulated, all the knowledge and technology we can use currently –a big difference compared to what it was possible to do 40 or 50 years ago— and be able to validly explain the UAPs reports.
Once they have been explained, and at the end of every year, --but also at any moment if it is needed— we are ready to make public what we have done. We are against secrecy and subscribe to a transparent policy of communication.
By the same token, if there were a case in which we were not able to reach a valid conclusion, we will declare it.
All our work is ready to be submitted to pair review, as the correct way to ratify its validity or correct any mistake.
We are ready to provide information to any investigator who asks about it but based on the same level exchange.
And we will continue to be selective about the people that can be part of our work or want to participate as Member of the UAPSG.
Milton W. Hourcade
Iowa City, April 23, 2020.
This is a web site dedicated to exchanging valuable information about Unusual Aerial Phenomena, air and space new technologies and the latest in Physics about the matter and the Universe.
24 April 2020
02 April 2020
El MIT y NASA desarrollan "metamaterial" para aviación
El MIT y la NASA desarrollan un ala "metamaterial" que se auto-forma, hecha de cientos de
diminutas partes.
Por David Szondy
El siguiente artículo que se origina en el Instituto de Tecnología de Massachussetts (MIT) es una traducción del publicado en Internet por "NEW ATLAS". Lo reproducimos en el interés de que nuestros lectores estén al tanto de las novedades que se producen en el área aeronáutica.
--------------
Un equipo de investigadores liderado por la NASA y el MIT ha creado un nuevo diseño radical de alas que no sólo es mucho más liviano que las alas convencionales, sino que también tiene el potencial de reconfigurarse automáticamente para cumplir con las condiciones de vuelo del momento.
Construido con pequeñas baldosas de polímero idénticas conectadas por montantes, el nuevo "metamaterial" mecánico promete una producción y mantenimiento de aeronaves más rápido y más barato.
Las alas de los aviones son estructuras complicadas que son costosas de diseñar, construir y mantener. Para hacer su trabajo, requieren un complejo sistema de superficies de control, motores, cables e hidráulica para funcionar, de modo que un ala rígida pueda usar superficies de control rígidas que se deslizan e inclinan para controlar el flujo de aire que pasa sobre ellas.
--------------
Un equipo de investigadores liderado por la NASA y el MIT ha creado un nuevo diseño radical de alas que no sólo es mucho más liviano que las alas convencionales, sino que también tiene el potencial de reconfigurarse automáticamente para cumplir con las condiciones de vuelo del momento.
Construido con pequeñas baldosas de polímero idénticas conectadas por montantes, el nuevo "metamaterial" mecánico promete una producción y mantenimiento de aeronaves más rápido y más barato.
Las alas de los aviones son estructuras complicadas que son costosas de diseñar, construir y mantener. Para hacer su trabajo, requieren un complejo sistema de superficies de control, motores, cables e hidráulica para funcionar, de modo que un ala rígida pueda usar superficies de control rígidas que se deslizan e inclinan para controlar el flujo de aire que pasa sobre ellas.
El problema es que esas superficies rígidas no son en manera alguna tan eficientes como podrían serlo. Peor aún, cada ala es transigir, no con un ala ideal, sino entre una serie completa de formas de ala ideales que serían necesarias para proporcionar el mejor rendimiento al despegar, aterrizar y cualquier otra condición de vuelo entre medio.
Esta es una razón importante por la cual los aviones son tan costosos de construir y también por qué su diseño es casi invariablemente el sub-óptimo de un par de alas pegadas a un tubo.
Sin embargo, el equipo de la NASA / MIT tiene una alternativa en la construcción de un ala que se auto-forma. Esa idea no es nueva. El primer Aparato Volante de los hermanos Wright en 1903 usó un ala de auto-formación para los controles, pero la nueva idea es construir el ala a partir de baldosas en forma de cubos, triángulos u otras formas de polímeros diminutos, idénticos, huecos, similares a la goma hechos de monturas del tamaño de una cerilla a lo largo de cada borde. Estos se pueden atornillar juntos para formar una estructura entramada abierta y liviana que está cubierta por una capa delgada similar a un polímero como piel.
La nueva foma de construir aviones permitiría diseños radicales.
Según el MIT, el resultado es un "metamaterial" mecánico que tiene la misma rigidez que un ala convencional, pero la densidad de un aerogel. En términos de números, eso significa reducir la densidad de la goma de 1,500 kg por metro cúbico a 5,6 kg por metro cúbico. Esto no sólo hace que el ala sea mucho más liviana, sino que también es capaz de reformarse para satisfacer las condiciones de vuelo.
La concepción del artista muestra un avión de cuerpo de ala integrado, habilitado por el nuevo método de construcción, ensamblado por un grupo de robots especializados, que se muestra en naranja.
El concepto del artista muestra aviones integrados de cuerpo de ala, habilitados por el nuevo método de construcción ensamblado por un grupo de robots especializados, que se muestra en color naranja. (Eli Gershenfeld / NASA Ames Research Center).
Aviones de ala combinada serían ideales para la nueva propuesta.
Pero lo más inteligente es que el diseño se puede hacer aún más simple y liviano al eliminar la necesidad de activadores y cables complejos y pesados para realizar la reconfiguración. El equipo dice que al hacer coincidir la flexibilidad y la posición relativa de las monturas en el material del ala con las cargas colocadas sobre él, el mismo puede reconfigurarse pasiva y automáticamente en la forma necesaria.
La primera versión del material fue hecha a mano usando chorros de agua para producir cada loseta en cuestión de minutos, pero un nuevo método de moldeo por inyección ha reducido esto a 17 segundos. Al combinar esto con el ensamblaje robótico, será posible no sólo aumentar el sistema mientras se mantienen bajos los costos, sino que también dará libertad a los ingenieros para usar diseños de aeronaves más eficientes, como un ala combinada donde el casco y el ala se funden uno en otro. Además, el sistema también podría usarse para construir grandes turbinas eólicas en su sitio o para construir estructuras en el espacio.
Traducción especial para el UAPSG-GEFAI por Milton W. Hourcade
MIT and NASA develop auto-morphing "metamaterial".
MIT and NASA develop auto-morphing "metamaterial" wing made of hundreds of tiny parts
You find this article in "New Atlas" web page, related to Aviation.
See: https://newatlas.com/mit-nasa-morphing-wings/59109/
We consider this information important to keep track of the advances in aviation.
24 March 2020
EL MÉTODO CIENTÍFICO
Se supone que de la aplicación del mismo dependerá la validez de las conclusiones arribadas respecto del tema en general o de la específica dilucidación de un caso.
Debido a ello, nos hemos dado a cierta lectura vía internet, a fin de establecer lo más claramente posible en qué consiste el método científico, cómo se aplica en la práctica y cuáles son --obviamente-- sus ventajas y su validez final.
El método científico es un método empírico de adquirir conocimiento que ha caracterizado el desarrollo de la ciencia desde por lo menos el Siglo 17. El mismo comprende la observación ciudadosa, aplicando riguroso escepticismo acerca de lo que es observado, dado que las suposiciones cognitivas puedes distorsionar cómo uno interpreta la observación. Comprende formular hipótesis, vía inducción, basadas en tales observaciones; poner a prueba en forma experimental y basada en mediciones las deducciones extraídas de la hipótesis; y refinamiento (o eliminación) de la hipótesis en base a los hallazgos experimentales Estos son principios del método científico, que se distinguen de una definitiva serie de pasos aplicables a todos los emprendimientos científicos.
Aunque hay diversos modelos disponibles para el método científico, en general hay un contínuo proceso que incluye observaciones acerca del mundo natural. Las personas son naturalmente inquisitivas, de modo que a menudo vienen con preguntas acerca de cosas que ven o escuchan, y a menudo desarrollan ideas o hipótesis acerca de por qué las cosas son como son. Las mejores hipótesis conducen a predicciones que se pueden poner a prueba de varias maneras. La forma más concluyente de poner a prueba hipótesis procede de un razonamiento basado en la información experimental cuidadosamente controlada. Dependiendo de cuán bien pruebas adicionales sean compatibles con las predicciones, la hipótesis original puede requerir refinamiento, alteración, expansión o aún rechazo. Si una particular hipótesis resulta muy bien sustentada, puede desarrollarse una teoría general.
Aunque los procedimientos pueden variar de uno a otro campo de indagación, frecuentemente son los mismos de uno a otro. El proceso del método científico implica hacer conjeturas (hipótesis), derivando predicciones de las mismas como lógicas consecuencias, y luego llevar a cabo experimentos u observaciones empíricas basadas en esas predicciones. Una hipótesis es una conjetura, basada en conocimiento obtenido mientras se buscan respuestas a la cuestión. La hipótesis debe ser muy específica, o puede ser amplia. Los científicos luego ponen a prueba hipótesis llevando a cabo experimentos o estudios. Una hipótesis científica debe ser falsificable, implicando que es posible identificar un posible resultado de un experimento u observación que entra en conflicto con las predicciones deducidas desde la hipótesis; de lo contrario la hipótesis no puede ser significativamente puesta a prueba. [en otras palabras, existe la capacidad de demostrar que la hipótesis planteada está equivocada – N. del T.]
El propósito de un experimento es determinar si las observaciones concuerdan o entran en conflicto con los pronósticos derivados de una hipótesis. Los experimentos pueden tener lugar en cualquier parte, desde un garaje al Gran Colisionador Hadron del CERN. Hay dificultad en la formulación de declaraciones del método, sin embargo. Aunque el método científico es a menudo presentado como una secuencia fija de pasos, representa más bien un conjunto de principios generales. No todos los pasos tienen lugar en una búsqueda científica (no al mismo grado), y no están siempre en el mismo orden. Algunos filósofos y científicos han argumentado que no hay un método científico; los mismos incluyen a Lee Smolin y al filósofo Paul Feyerabend (en su Contra el Método). Robert Nola y Howard Sankey remarcan que “Para algunos la mera idea de una teoría del método científico es un debate del tiempo pasado”. [pero esta postura ha desatado una gran polémica – N. del T.].
Un esquema linear pragmático es el siguiente:
1. Defina un problema o interrogante
2. Reúna información y recursos (observe)
3. Forme una hipótesis explicativa
4. Ponga a prueba la hipótesis realizando un experimento y recogiendo información de modo reproducible.
5. Analice la información.
6. Interprete la información y extraiga conclusiones que sirvan como el punto inicial de nuevas hipótesis
7. Publique los resultados
8. Vuelva a ponerlos a prueba (frecuentemente hecho por otros científicos)
Comunicación y comunidad
Frecuentemente el método científico no es empleado por una sola persona sino por un grupo de varias personas cooperando directa o indirectamente.
Evaluación de revisión por pares
Los periódicos científicos usan un proceso de revisión por pares, en que manuscritos son sometidos por los editores a uno a tres colegas científicos –usualmente anónimos—familiarizados con el campo de evaluación.
Archivo
Los investigadores a veces practican el archivo de datos científicos, en cumplimiento de políticas de agencias gubernamentales que financian proyectos, o de publicaciones científicas.
El rasero de Ockham
Es el principio de solución de un problema que esencialmente establece que “las soluciones más simples son más propensas a ser correctas, que las complejas.” Cuando se presentan hipótesis que compiten entre sí para resolver un problema, uno debe elegir la solución con la menor cantidad de suposiciones” La idea se le atribuye al Franciscano inglés William de Ockham (c. 1287-1347) un filósofo escolástico y teólogo.
[En otras palabras: de dos explicaciones que compiten, debe elegirse la más simple – N. del T.].
Extractado de Wikipedia y otras varias fuentes complementarias.
Traducción especial para UAPSG-GEFAI a cargo de Milton W. Hourcade
15 March 2020
WE WELCOME THE UPDATE OF UFO FOTOCAT
Here, yes, to keep our members of the UAPSG-GEFAI correctly informed and for all avid readers of a serious and responsible source, we are pleased to share with you the UFO FOTOCAT, the most complete and always updated world catalog managed by our beloved friend and outstanding colleague UFOLOGIST, Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, from Valencia, Spain.
Why is this catalog useful ?, because it allows us to see how "cases" that have suddenly gained international fame end up being adequately explained. Secondly, because from it we learn how to solve future cases that seem intricate, and third: it is a source of information and training, but also one to which we can make our own contribution to enrich it.
The UFO FOTOCAT is presented in two versions, one in Spanish and the other in English.
http://fotocat.blogspot.com/
DAMOS LA BIENVENIDA A LA ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL UFO FOTOCAT
Aquí sí, para mantener correctamente informados a
nuestros miembros del UAPSG-GEFAI y para todo lector ávido de una fuente seria
y responsable, tenemos el placer de compartir con Uds. el UFO FOTOCAT, el
catálogo mundial más completo y siempre actualizado que gestiona nuestro
querido amigo y destacado colega UFÓLOGO, Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, desde
Valencia, España.
¿Por qué es
útil este catálogo?, porque nos permite ver cómo "casos" que de pronto
han cobrado fama internacional, terminan por ser adecuadamente explicados.
En
segundo lugar, porque de ello aprendemos cómo resolver futuros casos que
parezcan intrincados, y tercero: es una fuente de información y formación, pero
además, una a la que podemos hacer nuestro propio aporte para irla
enriqueciendo.
El UFO
FOTOCAT se presenta en dos versiones, una en español y la otra en inglés.
Ir a:
http://fotocat.blogspot.co/2020_03_13_archive.html#es
06 March 2020
A MUST-READ - UNA LECTURA OBLIGADA
And when you go to the material included in this publication you immediately find why its reading is highly needed.
I wish to bring this piece of excellent Ufology to all those that use to be so enthusiastic about "ufos" as "extraterrestrial crafts" and about the current MUFON as a reliable organization.
But for all seriously interested in the UFO subject and particularly for those who investigate applying the scientific method, this is a must-read.
And yes, it is in English, the language of science. Sorry for those who do not manage this language, which --fortunately-- are becoming a minority.
Go to http://www.astronomyufo.com/UFO/SUNlite12_2.pdf
and enjoy it!
Milton W. Hourcade
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








