Michael Shermer
November 23, 2025 - 15 min read
The Age of Disclosure (2025) by Dan Farah, Executive Producers Jay Stratton and Luis Elizondo, released November 21, 2025, available on Amazon Prime.
Here we go…again. Another documentary film about how disclosure of alien contact is imminent. It’s a claim I’ve been hearing for over three decades, albeit this one is of a higher quality than the dozens of similar such docs available on Amazon Prime (and hundreds more on YouTube).
With The Age of Disclosure, filmmaker Dan Farah (Call Jane, Ready Player One, The Phenomenon) has lifted the genre to a higher level than the others (James Fox being the exception, with The Phenomenon—credit shared with Farah—well worth watching). I was tempted to offer a snarky “I watched it so you don’t have to,” but if you are relatively new to the UFO/UAP topic, I recommend investing the twenty bucks Amazon Prime charges to rent the film for 30 days ($25 to buy it). The artfully edited trailer hints at what is to come in the full film.
The Age of Disclosure is packaged and produced so well that naïve viewers may come away thinking that something strikingly original, shockingly new, and world-shaking is about to be loosed among the world.
Alas, it is not to be. Every fact, opinion, or anecdote in the film has been rehearsed elsewhere in recent years, and a good deal of the footage is from Congressional hearings, media reports, and stock interviews that have been circulating for years on CNN, Fox News, News Nation, and even the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, along with other mainstream media sources and large-audience podcasts.
But the fusillade of statements, interspersed with the familiar UAP grainy videos and UFO blurry photographs, leaves no doubt about the film’s conclusion:
“We are not alone in the universe.”
“Humans are not the only intelligence in the universe.”
“They’re real, they’re here, and they’re not human.”
“Non-human intelligences are here and have been interacting with humanity for a
long time.”
“We are not the only intelligent life form on the planet. There’s something
else here.”
“This is the biggest discovery in human history.”
Wow, can we see these aliens and
their spaceships?
Nope.
Why not?
The opening credentialing sequence gives us a clue: when you don’t actually
have concrete evidence that we can all see, your case depends on eyewitness
accounts so you must establish that their words are trustworthy and reliable.
For example, the intrepid UAP proponent Lue Elizondo says:
“If you could be in my shoes and see what I’ve seen, there would be zero shadow of a doubt that these things are real and they are not made by humans.”
The problem is that we can’t be in anyone else’s shoes, so we depend on evidence that does not depend on a single eyewitness. “If only you could have been in my shoes that night when I saw Bigfoot—there would be zero shadow of a doubt….” In science, such anecdotes do not count as evidence; you need to be able to show actual physical evidence—in this case a body of a Bigfoot.
Continuing my biological analogy, in order to name a new species you have to present a type specimen—a holotype—that everyone can see, examine, photograph, analyze, etc. If you gave a talk at a biology conference about how you discovered a new species of bipedal primate, no one would take you seriously if you did not also present unmistakable evidence.
If all you had were stories about what you saw, and maybe a couple of out-of-focus videos and grainy photographs, no one would believe you…and for good reason!
What scientists and skeptics are asking of the UFO and UAP community is to, at long last, show us the evidence.
We have been hearing of pending disclosure for half a century and are always left wanting. We don’t need to know your credentials, how many years you worked for the U.S. government or military, or how strongly you believe that what you saw was aliens or alien craft; just show us what you claim is here and we will all believe. QED! *[latinism: it has to be demonstrated].
But no. Here is parapsychologist, remote viewing researcher, and UFOlogist Hal Puthoff:
“The classified data that we had access to when we joined the program was indisputable.”
Here is astrophysicist and UFOlogist Eric Davis:
“There is 80 years of data that the public isn’t even aware of.”
Here is Jay Stratton, prominently featured in the film as one of the defense officials who first investigated UAP:
“The things that I’ve seen, the clearest videos, the best evidence we have that these are non-human intelligence, remains classified. I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings.”
He saw it himself! No FOAF (Friend of a Friend) urban legend. O-kay, but can I see it with my own eyes? No? Then I remain skeptical, as it should be in science.
The film then reviews most of the standard UAP pilot accounts, such as this from Navy pilot Ryan Graves: “They [UAPs] were ubiquitous. We were seeing them almost daily.” If true, given that nearly every commercial airline passenger has a smart phone with a high-definition camera at the ready, there should be thousands of clear and unmistakable photographs and videos of these UAPs. To date there is not one. Nada. Zilch. Here the absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
Where were the aliens in 1945 to stop the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
A key message of the film is that there are political and even military ramifications of UAPs. Here is Stratton again: “They [UAPs] have both activated and deactivated nuclear weapons in both the U.S. and Russia.” In the category of “If this were true, what else would be true?”… where were the aliens in 1945 to stop the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Why did they allow us to detonate the first atomic bomb in New Mexico? Why didn’t they curtail the hundreds of nuclear explosions in the Nevada desert and the South Pacific? The answer is classic hand-waving rationalization, as in Stanford University professor and UFOlogist Gary Nolan’s answer: “They [the aliens] were willing to let us see the consequences of our actions.”
To add urgency to the film, Elizondo tells us that “It [UAP sightings] is happening all over the world and it is happening with greater frequency.” The Bayesian reasoner in me asks: can we see some data on the base rate of sightings over the decades to make an assessment if, in fact, there has been an increase in frequency? No such data is provided.
Another standard theme throughout the film is explaining why—despite the unmitigated confidence that alien contact has been discovered (but not yet disclosed)—the evidence is not readily available. Several reasons are on offer, such as this one from Elizondo: “religious fundamentalists in the Pentagon who had a severe adversity to this topic…put their religion above national security.” Among the fundies, apparently, were those who told Stratton “these were demons and we were messing with Satan’s world.”
The documentary has attracted wide attention, including coverage from Bill Maher on HBO and Joe Rogan.
As for the larger issue of the consequences of disclosure on religious faith, numerous surveys over the years have consistently found that the vast majority of religious people would not find the discovery of extra-terrestrial intelligences (“non-human biologics” in the newfangled UAP jargon meant to legitimize an otherwise fringe movement) in any way a threat to their religious beliefs. Theologian Ted Peters, for example, queried 1,300 people on the matter, finding that most people do not think the discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence would shake their faith. The reason is as obvious as it is logical: If an omnipotent deity can create life on Earth, he could do it elsewhere in the universe. In a cosmos with a sextillion planets (1 followed by 21 zeros, or 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000), what a terrible waste of space it would be (echoing Carl Sagan) to create a cosmos so vast as to house so many planets, only one of which would contain sentient consciousness beings worthy of saving.
What are these UAPs, exactly? Here the film segues into a chalkboard lecture by Elizondo, who explains that there are four hypotheses on offer:
- Foreign adversary technology that we simply don’t understand.
- A robust counter-intelligence program to cover-up a U.S. program.
- Interdimensional or extraterrestrial.
- A combination of the above.
Unfortunately, left off the list was…
- Ordinary terrestrial phenomena.
- None of the above.
For #5, I am fond of quoting from Leslie Kean’s 2010 book UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go on the Record, in which the UFOlogist admitted that “roughly 90 to 95 percent of UFO sightings can be explained” as: weather balloons, flares, sky lanterns, planes flying in formation, secret military aircraft, birds reflecting the sun, planes reflecting the sun, blimps, helicopters, the planets Venus or Mars, meteors or meteorites, space junk, satellites, swamp gas, spinning eddies, sundogs, ball lightning, ice crystals, reflected light off clouds, lights on the ground or lights reflected on a cockpit window, temperature inversions, hole-punch clouds, and the list goes on!
Elizondo then ticked off six characteristics (“observables” because, well, it sounds more scientific) about UAP:
- Hypersonic velocity (40,000 mph or faster).
- Instantaneous acceleration (would kill pilots; even a drone would disintegrate).
- Low visibility (no contrails, no sonic boom, no thrust, no exhaust).
- Transmedium travel: (space, air, underwater).
- Anti-gravity (without any obvious means—no wings, rockets, etc.).
- Biological effects (energy weapons, getting too close to UAPs, burned, inflammation, orbs).
What’s more likely? That all of physics and aerodynamics needs revising, or that someone has misinterpreted a low-resolution video?
All of these assumptions are based on highly questionable interpretations of grainy videos and blurry photographs of UAPs/UFOs. For example, an incredibly grainy video apparently filmed from the USS Omaha off the coast of San Diego in July 2019, shows a dark blob appear to segue from above the waves to below. This, we are told, is clear and unmistakable evidence that UAPs can seemingly transition from the air into the ocean where, the speculation continues, can move through the water at hundreds of miles per hour. What’s more likely? That all of physics and aerodynamics needs revising, or that someone has misinterpreted a low-resolution unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) was filmed from the USS Omaha off the coast of San Diego in July 2019. CREDIT: Jeremy Corbell/WeaponizedPodcast
I was surprised—even shocked—to see that the film included accusations that Lue Elizondo was not completely honest about his role with the U.S. government in the UAP program. To wit, we are told that Pentagon spokesman Christopher Sherwood said:
“Mr. Elizondo had no responsibilities with regard to the AATIP program”
And Pentagon Spokesperson Susan Gough revealed:
“Luis Elizondo did not have any assigned responsibilities for AATIP.”
So included, I fully expected Elizondo to offer an explanation, or the filmmakers to include proof that Elizondo worked at AATIP. Surely they could have provided a contract or pay stubs or some employment paperwork for Elizondo and AATIP, but no. Did Elizondo work for AATIP?
It’s hard to believe that he didn’t, given how much information he reveals about what was going on in that department. And why would anyone lie about something so easy to check? Who knows, but UFOlogist Bob Lazar (who said he worked at Area 51 and back engineered alien spaceships) lied when he said he graduated with degrees in physics from MIT and Caltech when, in fact, he didn’t attend either such institution. Lazar’s lie was exposed by UFOlogist Stan Friedman, and the explanation on offer is that “they” erased all traces of Lazar’s academic record.
The film includes several high-profile interviews, among them Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
Another theme in the film that almost everyone I’ve ever engaged with on this topic is confused about, is articulated by former CIA Director John Brennan: “I think it’s a bit presumptuous, if not arrogant, for us to believe that there’s no other form of life anywhere in the entire universe.”
Of course, but that is not what any of this is about, or else the filmmakers would have interviewed SETI scientists, who have been listening for ETI signals for decades. The question “are they out there somewhere?” is a different matter entirely than “have they come here?” My provisional answers are “yes” and “no”, although as a good Bayesian I am willing to update my priors and flip my credence from skepticism to belief…with sufficient evidence.
What do the featured experts in this film think the aliens are? Elizondo suggests that they might be “cryptoterrestrial” (whatever that is—never explained) or some “proto-human” that branched off the family tree long ago and is “as natural to this planet as we are.”
“They’ve been operating here for a very long time.” How long? We are not told.
That’s the sanest of the explanations. Hal Puthoff suggests that the UAP aliens might be time travelers, or some ancient civilization hiding here on Earth or on the seabed. Well, they must be hiding exceptionally well, because explorers (and satellites) have covered nearly every square meter of the planet and there is no sign of such an ancient civilization. (Maybe they have a cloaking device, like the one the Starship Enterprise used to monitor primitive civilizations on other planets.) “Whoever it is and wherever they are,” Puthoff concludes, “they’ve been operating here for a very long time.” How long? We are not told.
One segment of the film stands out, and that is the so-called “Legacy Program” that is a “crash retrieval program” to “back-engineer” alien spaceships. Now, to be sure, the U.S. government (along with other governments) have such programs to study downed/crashed airplanes, jets, drones, and spacecraft of other nations, because obviously we’d like to know what the other guy is up to technologically, and that, apparently, has been going on since the First World War (“what kind of altimeter are those German biplanes using, anyway?”). But if you Google search “Legacy Program” this is what you find:
Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program: This is a real, long-standing government program that funds projects to protect natural and cultural resources on military installations. Its mission is to balance military readiness with environmental stewardship.
According to this site:
The mission of the Legacy Resource Management Program is to provide coordinated, Department-wide, and partnership-based integration of military mission readiness with the conservation of irreplaceable natural and cultural resources.
When pressed to explain this Legacy crash-retrieval program, the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) concluded in a 2024 report that “there is no evidence of such programs, attributing the claims to misidentified real events or circular reporting.”
Why the lacuna? Here is Lue Elizondo’s explanation: “The ‘Legacy Program’ was so secret that it was withheld from the Secretary of Defense, Congress, and even the President of the United States.” And: “We had a choice: keep silent while keeping Americans in the dark, or resign my position in protest and fulfill my obligations to the American people by telling the truth about what I know about UAP.”
Elizondo quit. How noble. It must fill one’s ego with massive pride to know that you have made the greatest discovery in the history of humanity and no one around you has any idea of this monumental event.
Throughout the film nods are made about UAPs as a “national security threat,” for example: “It could be China. It could be Russia.” Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper: “any unexplained phenomena could pose a national security threat.” Stratton: “Violation of all nations sovereign airspace presents a safety of flight concern for all military and commercial aviation.”
Well, sure it could, but does it in fact? And why include all these admonitions about national security threats to our nation from other nations, when none of these people think that is the origin of UAPs. As stated at the beginning, they all thing they’re space aliens.
An amusing (and to UFOlogists, irritating) question that skeptics such as me like to ask, “Why do they keep crashing?” If the aliens are so advanced, so sophisticated, and have engineered anti-gravity propulsion systems that can use relativistic quantum space-time bubbles to jet about the galaxy in the blink of an eye, why can’t they seem to land in New Mexico (and elsewhere) without slamming into the ground?
The film’s experts have a ready-made answer: They’re not crashing at all! These are intentionally left “gifts” to humanity. Or they’re a giant IQ test. Or, as in the film 2001: A Space Odyssey, it’s the aliens’ way of imputing superior intelligence into one species of hominin, namely us.
Why can’t we all see the evidence that the film’s experts have seen with their own eyes? Because it would freak everyone out: the stock market would tank, economies would collapse, governments would fold, and religions would abandon their faith beliefs. That’s what we’re told, anyway, and the filmmakers insist that the coverup is so extensive and powerful that “99.99 percent of all scientists are skeptical.” Perhaps, but could it be that 99.99 percent of scientists think like scientists who demand extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims?
Then there is the assertion that “they” are silencing people in the know with threats to their jobs, careers, and lives. Elizondo: “Historically, every time a military member had a UAP encounter, it was very quickly swept under the rug and they were discouraged from talking about it.”
Right, so then why are all these military eyewitnesses going on CNN, Fox News, and Joe Rogan to tell millions of people about their UAP encounters? If “they” are so effective at covering up the existence of aliens, how is it that there are thousands of articles and news stories, hundreds of books and documentaries, and endless podcast discussions ongoing, without a single person (that I know of) fired or killed for telling us all what they know about these programs?
Another tell in the film about the lack of actual photographic or video evidence of said alien spaceships (aside from the half dozen UAP videos that have been recycled endlessly for years—TicTac, Go-Fast, Gimbal, etc.) is the inclusion of artistic representations of hovering spaceships over U.S. military bases. If there are any photographs, videos, or security camera footage of any kind available—as surely there must be if these events happened as reported—they were not included.
Example: Vandenberg Air Force base, where Elon Musk’s SpaceX launches its rockets, appears to be a hotbed of alien surveillance. A former employee there says that there are over 60 cameras that record everything that ever happens during a rocket launch. And yet, mysteriously, on October 14, 2003, there was an “incursion” in which there was “a red square object hovering in the air above the launch pad at low altitude, making no noise, it had no obvious signs of propulsion, and it was just hovering silently. It was a security breach of the area. (…) It was massive. The size of a football field, almost rectangular in shape, it was just floating there, no propulsion system, no windows. It was flat black. Then it shot off thousands of miles an hour up the coast.”
Surely the filmmakers managed to wrangle from SpaceX or the base commanders at Vandenberg actual footage of this sighting? Nope. As usual we are left with our (and an artist’s) imagination.
The film wraps up with speculations about how, exactly, these UAPs manage to pull off such feats of propulsion and maneuverability, going full science fiction mode with the pantheon of experts speculating about space-warping bubbles in which spaceships can zoom off in an instant because space itself is being warped so it doesn’t need to move through normal space (or ocean). Puthoff: “So time moves differently for people inside the bubble versus people outside the bubble. (… )This could be the key to interstellar travel.” Hopefully Elon and his SpaceX engineers are taking notes.
On this matter I am reminded of the comedian Mitch Hedberg’s riff on why photos of Bigfoot are blurry: “It’s not the photographers, it’s the subject. I think Bigfoot is just fuzzy. You know, I think there’s a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he’s fuzzy!”
In UAP circles, life imitates art. Radar signals, we are told in the film by Eric Davis, cannot detect UAPs “because the signal just moves around the bubble and doesn’t reflect back to the radar operator.” Here is Hal Puthoff in full Hedberg mode: “This explains why people who take a photo of a UAP get a fuzzy and distorted picture because they’re actually taking a photo through a spacetime barrier.”
Once you convince yourself that this is all real, it is natural to ask, “what is their energy source?” Continuing in full science fiction fantasy, Eric Davis calculates that “UAP performance implies the use of 1,100 billion watts of power. This is 100 times the daily electrical utility power generated in the U.S.” Where do the aliens find such energy? “Vacuum energy. Zero-point energy. Quantum entanglement.” The film ends with speculation that when disclosure of this technology comes online it will solve all our energy demands and replace oil, natural gas, and coal.
This is all very entertaining. Who doesn’t love science fiction? But The Age of Disclosure claims to be science fact. The evidence for it remains as elusive as it ever was, as I explained in my $1000 bet on the Long Now Foundation’s Long Bets site that “Discovery or disclosure of alien visitation to Earth in the form of UFOs, UAPs, or any other technological artifact or alien biological form, as confirmed by major scientific institutions, will not happen by December 31, 2030.”
Since posting this, Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb has accepted the bet and we each donated $500 to the Long Now Foundation, the proceeds of the winnings to go to the Galileo Project. I am reasonably confident I will win, but I am hoping to lose because I agree with the experts in The Age of Disclosure that this would indeed be the greatest discovery in the history of humanity, “and everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned” (Yeats, of course).
Share This Article:
Think a friend would enjoy this? Send it their way!
Michael Shermer
Michael Shermer is the Editor-in-Chief of Skeptic magazine and the bestselling author of “Conspiracy," "Why People Believe Weird Things," and other books on science and skepticism.
